Email this Article to a Friend
Institute of Medicine: No Scientific Justification for Sugar Intake Limits
 
On October 13, government officials finalizing guidelines for Americans’ diets and exploring possible front-of-package food labels received a clear signal from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) -- there is no scientific justification for targeting sugar.

This IOM finding, which is part of the IOM’s Examination of Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase 1 Report, is consistent with a March 2010 ruling against setting strict sugar intake limits by the
European Food Safety Authority, Europe’s equivalent of the Food and Drug Administration.  The European Union also rejected a new food labeling system, using a stoplight approach, to tell consumers what they should and shouldn’t eat.

“Obesity is a problem that America must address,” said Andy Briscoe, president and CEO of the Sugar Association, “but government dietary policy must be the result of sound science and common sense, not emotion or speculation.  As the IOM panel has highlighted, having information about serving size and calories on the front of food packages is important in the fight against obesity.”

Sugar, like all other foods, should be consumed in moderation, Briscoe explains.  But science doesn’t support the inclusion of federally mandated sugar consumption limits in the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which are due out later this year.

Those guidelines will affect nearly every public nutrition program in the United States and likely would be the basis for possible new labeling regulations.

The IOM seems to agree.  “There is a lack of scientific agreement about the amount of sugars that can be consumed in a healthy diet,” it noted in the report.  “Thus, it is difficult to conclude that total sugars intake is of sufficient public health concern to be included in FOP [Front of Package] rating systems.”

Briscoe applauded the IOM for putting science first.  “All-natural sugar is a healthy part of a balanced diet,” he said.  “The IOM has reinforced this time after time.”

Following the IOM’s announcement, the Sugar Association sent letters to officials at the Department of Agriculture and Health and Human Services highlighting the findings.
 

[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
Bookmark & Share:           
Back to Front Page
Social Share:      
Visit Our Website
 
In This Issue...
Institute of Medicine: No Scientific Justification for Sugar Intake Limits
Have a Sweet Halloween
Parents of Multiples
Look Who's Switching to Sugar...
In case you missed it, a groundswell of consumer demand will return Pepsi Throwback to shelves in 2011.
 
 
 
More on Consumer Confusion
Fact Sheet: Consumers have a right to know about sweeteners
Audio: Consumer Sweetener Confusion News Release
See what new sweetener labels might look like
Contact for Reporters
Mollie O’Dell, 202-714-5993
odell@sugar.org

 
ARCHIVE
The Sugar Packet
September 14, 2010
Vol. 2010 Issue 9
The Sugar Packet
August 3, 2010
Vol. 2010 Issue 8
The Sugar Packet
July 21, 2010
Vol. 2010 Issue 7

[MORE]
Published by Sugar Association
Copyright 2010 Sugar Association. All rights reserved.
TELL A FRIEND
RSS Feed
Created with Inbox Group